Some Surprising Info About Automobiles Carbon Footprint

By Cornelius Nunev


For good or bad, governments and a good cross portion of people want to reduce the "carbon footprint" or emissions of carbon dioxide, of human civilization. It's not so much that automobiles are not contributing, but some data about vehicles carbon footprint could be astonishing.

Not too bad to own an automobile

One of the most common things people look at on the subject of reducing their carbon footprint is their car. A lot of people are working hard to reduce the carbon footprint of civilization.

However, a study from New Zealand, according to AutoGuide, suggests the carbon footprint of a dog is roughly the same as that of a Toyota Landcruiser, Toyota's luxury full-size SUV with a 4.6-liter V-8.

The Landcruiser averages 6,200 miles a year making 55.1 gigajoules of energy. That is equivalent to 1.1 acres of land. That is not very bad compared with the 2.07 acres needs for a dog to live. The average dog utilizes 3.17 ounces of meat and 5.5 ounces of grain per sitting. That means that just one year of kibble to feed a dog is more than one year of running a vehicle, according to the study done by Robert and Brenda Vale.

More intriguing things to consider

Buying a dog will not cost you carloans, though buying a new Landcruiser will, but that does not mean anything about a carbon footprint. People usually drive 12,400 miles instead of the 6,200 figure Vales presented. The comparison was not quite accurate, but even with the higher number, the Landcruiser only produced a carbon footprint of 2.2 acres of land.

A Volkswagen Golf automobile has the same carbon footprint as a cat.

Edmunds explained that you are better off with a Ford Raptor pickup that has a 6.2-liter V-8 with 411 horsepower than with a gas-powered leaf blower. There was Environmental Protection Agency testing methods done to find the results by looking at the most common emissions complaints about with vehicles.

The Echo two stroke leafblower and the Ryobi four-stroke leafblower are much worse than the Ryobi. The Ryobi had 13.5 times more nitrous oxide, 36 times more NMHC emissions and 6.8 times more carbon dioxide than the Raptor, and the two-stroke numbers were much worse than that.

Many things emit more carbon than automobiles

The New York Times explained that electric automobiles actually have big footprints too. Even though the carbon footprints are not terrible, they are about the same as a normal subcompact. The vehicles are powered through electricity, and 45 percent of the electricity in the nation is generated by coal still. That means some areas are really bad for electricity.

You do not have to start picketing all Nissan dealers, Everett, Washington to Miami, Florida, now that you realize that electric cars are not all they are cracked up to be. There are not that many electric cars being produced anyway. They do, however, produce more emissions when they are being produced. AutoBlog explained that producing a hybrid car produces 8 percent more carbon dioxide than a regular car. It is 12 percent more for a plug-in hybrid and 23 percent more carbon dioxide for a fully electric car, according a study done in 2011 by the Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment